In this article, the author will be reviewing the parameters
and causes of a trending and significant topic in Trinbagonian pop- culture as
well as musical anthologies used as research on infidelity. In simple terms how
do you determine the basis of a horn?
According to “Shadow”( 2000 ) to be a candidate for such a phenomenon one
must first answer specific questions
such as: “ you working ?, you joking, you
dealing, you stealing ?”If your answer to these specifics are all met with ,no,
then you are in fact a candidate for horn and have also created the parameter
from which horn is based also know as the
“you looking for horn”.
According to Cassi (2014) when horn is achieved in many
cases, candidates develop emotions and need for stability which he coined as the
“I want to be the man in yuh house and not the Horner man” syndrome .This data
corresponds and interacts with a branch of the study done earlier of
plausibility of a horner man experiencing his own phenomenon this study by
Shadow (2011) “Horner man crying”
suggest that the “horner man’ can be “horned” .Supporting the basis of
the study of thought “karma” positing that what goes around, comes back around.
After years of seeing
the effects researchers have tried to determine what creates the best subject to
act on these impulse .Trinidad Ghost (2017) created a list (Dem does horn
(2017)) of genetic as well as social implications of horn such as one must be
“red with tattoos (he later confirmed this works for dougla girls as well),
overly social natures can also lead to such tendencies eg. “girls with 5000
friends, dem does horn”. Danger (2017) expanded the list disproving a portion
of Trinidad ghost theory, suggesting that ‘femme infedelus’( gyal who does
horn) was actually a restriction on the topic and that ‘horner men’ can be
defined by a two to one ratio (2:1) of baby mothers (“man who ha two baby mother”) as
well as indecisiveness (‘man who does say doh bother”)
This author believes that these interactions and responses to genetic theories and bodies of
work create broad suggestions without much active testing being done.The author
does believe however that a horn is possible, but suggest that it is only
defined as one only when you take it on”
.So stop being ridiculous.
Bibliography
