THE ANTHOLOGY OF HORN (scientific)

In this article, the author will be reviewing the parameters and causes of a trending and significant topic in Trinbagonian pop- culture as well as musical anthologies used as research on infidelity. In simple terms how do you determine the basis of a horn?

According to “Shadow”( 2000 )  to be a candidate for such a phenomenon one must  first answer specific questions such as: “ you working ?,  you joking, you dealing, you stealing ?”If your answer to these specifics are all met with ,no, then you are in fact a candidate for horn and have also created the parameter from which horn is based also know as the  “you looking for horn”.

According to Cassi (2014) when horn is achieved in many cases, candidates develop emotions and need for stability which he coined as the “I want to be the man in yuh house and not the Horner man” syndrome .This data corresponds and interacts with a branch of the study done earlier of plausibility of a horner man experiencing his own phenomenon this study by Shadow (2011) “Horner man crying”  suggest that the “horner man’ can be “horned” .Supporting the basis of the study of thought “karma” positing that what goes around, comes back around.

 After years of seeing the effects researchers have tried to determine what creates the best subject to act on these impulse .Trinidad Ghost (2017) created a list (Dem does horn (2017)) of genetic as well as social implications of horn such as one must be “red with tattoos (he later confirmed this works for dougla girls as well), overly social natures can also lead to such tendencies eg. “girls with 5000 friends, dem does horn”. Danger (2017) expanded the list disproving a portion of Trinidad ghost theory, suggesting that ‘femme infedelus’( gyal who does horn) was actually a restriction on the topic and that ‘horner men’ can be defined by a two to one ratio  (2:1) of baby mothers (“man who ha two baby mother”) as well as indecisiveness (‘man who does say doh bother”)

This author believes that these interactions and  responses to genetic theories and bodies of work create broad suggestions without much active testing being done.The author does believe however that a horn is possible, but suggest that it is only defined as one  only when you take it on” .So stop being ridiculous.

Bibliography